Back to stories
Policy

Apple to Pay $250M to Settle Class Action Over Delayed Siri AI Features

Michael Ouroumis2 min read
Apple to Pay $250M to Settle Class Action Over Delayed Siri AI Features

Apple has agreed to pay $250 million to settle a U.S. class action lawsuit that accused the company of misleading consumers about when its Apple Intelligence-powered Siri would actually arrive on iPhones, according to filings reported on May 6, 2026. The deal closes one of the most visible legal challenges yet over how the new generation of AI features has been marketed to mainstream buyers.

The complaint, filed in federal court in California as Landsheft v. Apple Inc., argued that Apple promoted a dramatically upgraded, AI-driven Siri at WWDC 2024 and in iPhone 16 launch ads, leaving customers with the impression that those features would be available shortly after purchase. In March 2025, Apple publicly delayed the more advanced Siri capabilities and quietly pulled the related ads, but plaintiffs said the campaigns had already run for months.

Who Qualifies and How Much They Get

The settlement covers U.S. buyers of Apple Intelligence-capable devices purchased between June 10, 2024 and March 29, 2025. Reports identify eligible models as the iPhone 16, iPhone 16e, iPhone 16 Plus, iPhone 16 Pro, iPhone 16 Pro Max, iPhone 15 Pro, and iPhone 15 Pro Max.

According to coverage of the proposed terms, claimants would receive a base payment of around $25 per eligible device, with a maximum of up to $95 per device depending on total claim volume. Apple did not admit wrongdoing as part of the agreement.

Why This Settlement Matters

The case is one of the first major consumer settlements tied directly to AI feature marketing rather than copyright, training data, or workplace use. By framing the dispute as straightforward false advertising, the plaintiffs sidestepped the harder questions about how AI models work and focused on a simpler one: did the product do what the ads promised on the day it shipped?

That framing has implications well beyond Apple. Hardware makers across the industry — from Windows-on-Arm laptop vendors to Android phone OEMs — have leaned heavily on AI capabilities in their 2024 and 2025 marketing campaigns, often previewing features that arrive months or years later through software updates. The Siri settlement gives plaintiffs' lawyers a template for similar suits whenever a marquee AI feature slips its launch window.

What Comes Next for Siri

Apple has continued to insist that its more capable Siri is on the way. Industry reports have pointed to iOS 27, expected to debut at WWDC on June 8, 2026, as the likely vehicle for the long-delayed personalized, on-screen-aware assistant.

For iPhone owners, the practical impact is modest at the individual level — at most a few dozen dollars — but the symbolic message is sharper: AI features sold in advance now carry real legal exposure if they fail to ship as advertised.

Learn AI for Free — FreeAcademy.ai

Take "AI Essentials: Understanding AI in 2026" — a free course with certificate to master the skills behind this story.

More in Policy

CAISI Signs Frontier AI Testing Pacts With Microsoft, Google DeepMind, and xAI
Policy

CAISI Signs Frontier AI Testing Pacts With Microsoft, Google DeepMind, and xAI

The Commerce Department's Center for AI Standards and Innovation will conduct pre-deployment evaluations of frontier models from Microsoft, Google DeepMind, and xAI, including testing in classified environments.

5 hours ago3 min read
White House Weighs AI Pre-Release Vetting in Sharp Reversal Driven by Anthropic's Mythos
Policy

White House Weighs AI Pre-Release Vetting in Sharp Reversal Driven by Anthropic's Mythos

The Trump administration is drafting an executive order to create a working group that would review frontier AI models before public release, with Anthropic's unreleased Claude Mythos cited as the catalyst.

1 day ago2 min read
Chinese Court Rules Firing Workers to Replace Them With AI Is Illegal
Policy

Chinese Court Rules Firing Workers to Replace Them With AI Is Illegal

The Hangzhou Intermediate People's Court has ruled that companies cannot lawfully dismiss employees solely to replace them with artificial intelligence, classifying AI adoption as a strategic business choice rather than an unavoidable change in circumstances.

3 days ago3 min read